BABU SEYA AND HIS SON "PAPI" TO LAUGH OR CRY TODAY WHEN THE DECISION BY THE COURT WILL BE RELEASED TODAY .

 

Nguza Vicking 'Babu Seya' and his son, Papii Coucher 'Child of the King'.

Court of Appeal today expects to make a decision to either accept or reject the request of the references submitted by the musician to the court.

Nguza Vicking 'Babu Seya' and his son, Papi Coach 'Child of the King', who sought the court shalt make reference to sentences of life iliyoitoa February 2010, to be fallible legal and acquitted.

According to a document called the court issued for lawyers on both sides, the court imemtaka Babu Seya and his son with advocates of both sides to arrive today in court to accept the decision of the application them.

Oct. 30 this year, a panel of three judges led by Judge Nataria Kimaro, Salum Massati and Mbarouk Mbarouk, heeded the request submitted to the court when a lawyer asked appeal, Bere Marando.

Counsel Marando claimed in accordance with the regulations of 66 of the Court of Appeal of 2009 provides authority for the Court of Appeal to review the sentences inazozitoa, so its customers have submitted their request because they believe the court erred legally in its judgment in February 2010. 

"Honorable judges, because the panel yours in his judgment confessed openly that the Court Resident Magistrate Kisutu erred recording evidence of children who claimed they were treated badly and asked appeal (Babu Seya and PII) and national laws say if the court itabaini that the lower court violated the procedures for recording the testimony of young children, then the evidence that young children used in court under them to convict the defendants is omitted and ask appeals or defendants are released.

"I know it is a difficult task to convince you guys judges to change your decision you have made ​​in the judgment of February 2010, which took them to convict my clients, but for defense it legal I ouainisha you show in your judgment you agree and my argument that the Court of Kisutu erred recording evidence of young children, I believe you will use discretion and your compliance with today I request the court let loose my clients, "he claimed Marando.

Counsel for the Respondent (DPP), Lighting Mwipopo, Jackson Lati, Imaculata Banzi and Joseph parties, requested the court throw it off the request, for all the reasons he gave was display during a public hearing into the appeal and were determined in the judgment issued by the court in February 2010. 

Jackson claimed as Marando sees judgment in 2010 was flawed, he asked to plan a court panel of five judges hearing his request and not a request to be heard by a panel of three water those who gave the judgment which he claims has flaws.